The “Pope “ to this day is still only the “Bishop” of Rome, jurisdiction maintained only within the sovereign state of the Vatican, located within Rome ,Italy. These are the Romans and the Roman Church referred to here when these terms are used. Rome and it’s claimed citizens have always been “ambitious“. They have always been challenged. Many other parts of the world differ in opinion as to where the “Mother” Church resides and who is it’s “Supreme Leader“.
East. West. The Empires that “created” their unifiers.
And that is what happened when Constantine created out of one Bishop of Rome the power and might and corruption of the Father of Fathers. One Ring to unite them all.
The Romans possessed an idea that no peoples or nation had aspired: Political Imperium . These words in their mouths meant power rather than empire. In their minds and in practice it was a system of political control and administration which took in all local traits of tribe, language,color,religion, nationality, culture, and military arms that aimed at uniting all under one central and centralizing political government that conceded the benefits of universal Roman law and Roman citizenship which was vested and safeguarded by local interests.
“At one stage of their history,Jews believed in and aspired to a “moral” imperium throughout the world. The great Hebrew prophets made this the object of their most impassioned pleas and exalted pronouncements.
The Greeks were the first to discover the universal empire of the human spirit.
Many ancient empires-Pharaonic,Assyrian,Persian,Babylonian- attempted to set up an economic-military imperium.
None but the Romans,evolved a political formula for a universal imperium.”
(“The Decline and Fall of the Roman Church”, Malachi Martin ,pg 84)
It took only the course of 300 hundred years before Rome’s Church transformed Rome’s Empirical administrative organization into one ecclesiastical system of bishoprics,dioceses,monasteries,colonies,garrisons,schools,libraries,administrative centers,envoys,representatives,courts of justice and a criminal system of intricate laws once under the Emperor, now all under the direct control of the Pope . Rome devolved by Luciferian design. The old families.
But how did they get there? For there were many obstacles that stood until unification and the implementation of the one world government and the time the one world Luciferian religion could be imposed on the slaves, chattel. They got there one step and tactic at a time. One deception and murder at a time.
Pax Romana ?
No Roman Peace under Empire. Just more religious perversions, murders and thefts along with much destruction ,death and carnage.
The Popes “Roman” Lateran Palace now became the new Senate. The cardinals were now the new Senate.
The Bishops ,Priests and deacons who lived in “Rome” now helped the “Pope”(father of fathers) administer this new “Imperium”.
Many were and still are to this day elected by Rome. The majority always having been Romance or Germanic. It was the rules of Empire. It was the norm of cancer.
The rules mandated that these “Holy” Roman citizens peopling the bureaucracy elect the head of the Imperium. And this they did from pope to pope, traditionally.
That’s why you will hear many a “Roman” Catholic priest refer to “traditions” as justification.
The Roman “Christians” were convinced that they were of a special breed of Holy people that God Himself channeled through.Or so they attempted to convince the rest of the world. Another thing they attempted to convince the world about was their direct right to elect the Bishop of Rome to govern them and all churches.
“Primarily, the Roman elective assembly chose a bishop from amongst themselves.Automatically(their automotons),their choice was accepted as God’s choice and the candidate so chosen became pope of the universal church.Power to rule came to him through the people from God, so they believed.”(pg 85 The Decline and fall of the Roman Church)
And they claim this right from justification in the names of Peter and Paul. But Paul was not an Apostle. And Peter was not left in charge of the church. Maybe not even as a Bishop of Rome.Peter did not definitiley abandon the Desposyni in Jerusalem to follow Paul to Rome.
But he was definitely not a Bishop of Jerusalem nor Desposyno. In the Gospels he acts adversarial towards Yeshua at times. In the other gospels he is completely hostile to the Magdalene, Miriam.
In the Gnostic Gospels he is hostile towards not only Mary Magdala but women in general due to his Palestinian Judaic customs and traditions.
Of course they might have just attached Peters name for ulterior motives? To discredit his testimony and actions he gives in both the gospels and the gnostic gospels. For that is the real Peter.
Now ,once again, Malachi Martin allows his Jesuit bias to color the history he presents. Not all accepted the appointments of Roman Bishops. And quite a few numbers definitely did not concede control ,power and authority of the whole “universal” church to the hands of one man….lest He be the divine named Yeshua,Elohim Adonai. And these people they elected were definitely not Desposyni.Heirs of the Lord. Or selected with the blessings of the Desposyni.
This is one reason to alter history by linguistical editing and manipulation. By censorship through slander. By guilt by association where no association existed. By destroying history through record and documentation and rewriting it. By collating certain texts and attaching names of dead men to give them credence. By attempting to erase our collective memory. But they survived. And our memory serves us…
In the “Books of the Savior” in the Askew Codex, there is an entitled section of work called Pistis Sophia (Faith Wisdom) that indicates how Mary Magdalene was referred to by Yeshua as “thou pure of the light” for her wisdom and understanding of the Kingdom of Heaven that surpassed Peter’s and the other’s comprehension despite their claim of her inferiority.
As Yeshua tells her,” Thou art she whose heart is more directed to the Kingdom of Heaven than all thy brothers.”
Peter and Andrew both had issues with her acknowledge favor by Yeshua. First, she was a woman. Secondly, she surpassed them in wisdom and knowledge. Most importantly, Yeshua loved her more than all of them.
Peter, in Pistis Sophia , complains to Yeshua that Mary is dominating all the sessions that Yeshua is holding, with her answers and questions, leaving all of them not being able to get in a word edgewise.
Peter, ” My Lord , we are not able to suffer this woman who takes the opportunity from us and does not allow anyone of us to speak, but she speaks many times.”
This was common Palestinian Judaic male mindset. The presence of women was not accepted except in a servile demeaning role . Especially intelligent, self-thinking women. It was taught in many familial circles that the downfall of man was to be placed on the shoulders of women, as it was Eve who listened to the Serpent and then “decided” to drag her Husband Adam into the “sin”. Never mind, according to this machismo train of thought, that Adam, as the husband was supposed to be on the lookout for Old Scratch and protecting Eve from the subtle cunningness of the beast.
And the Adonai Elohim called unto Adam,” Where are you?”
So even Andrew complains against Mary ,in the Gospel of Mary Magdalene, to the others when she attempts to comfort the others on their grief at Yeshua’s “death” at the request of Peter.
Peter, ” Sister we know that the Savior loved you more than other women. Tell us all that you can remember of what the Savior said to you alone- everything that you know of him but we do not”.
Mary tells them that Yeshua told her,” Blessed are you for not faltering at the sight of me: for where the mind is, there is the treasure.”
Again, psychosocial indoctrination steps in as is apparent at Andrews’s reaction and response,” Say whatever you like about what has been said. I for one do not believe the savior said that.”
Of course Peter has to add his two cents by agreeing with Andrew,” Would he really have spoken privately to a woman and not freely to us?” Palestinian Judaic Machismo. Yeshua did not conform to this “norm” or “tradition”. Peter, Andrew… Paulist theology in the making.
Destroying and maligning the memory of Mary Magdalene and the Desposyni was crucial.
Mary wept and said to Peter….”Do you think that I thought this all up myself or that I am not telling the truth about the Savior?”
Levi answered and said unto Peter, “You have always been hot tempered. Now I see you arguing with the woman as if you were enemies. But if the Savior found her worthy who are you indeed to reject her? The Savior surely knows her well enough .“
Perfect for a foundation that would not only further tradition but erode, defile and distort and destroy the memory and legacy of the Most beloved of Apostles and the Desposyni.
“Now the existence of the world depends on man and the existence of man on marriage.” ONE MARRIAGE.
For even in the “Gospel of Philip” it definitely without a doubt stated that Yeshua loved Mary Magdalene, the Saviors consort, which means royal wife. And this was evidence and justification for the Roman Church to become a male dominated exclusive hierarchy to be threatened by the truth of the what the female represented and devise a way to neutralize it. These truths would stand in the way of Luciferian Domination of humanity.
And the consort of the Savior is Mary Magdalene. But Yeshua loved her more than all the disciples and used to kiss her often on the mouth. The rest of the disciples were offended by it and expressed disapproval. They said unto Him, Why do you love her more than all of us? The Savior answered and said to them,” Why do I not love you like her?…Great is the mystery of marriage, for without it the world would not have existed. Now the existence of the world depends on man and the existence of man on marriage. ” Gospel of Philip
It was now time for Rome to select some figures that would fit this agenda. Peter? Paul? And get the rest of the world to accept this “New” testament by manipulations, lies, thefts and murders. All the tricks of Lucifer.
Addressing the other Apostles, Peter says to them,” “Let Mary leave us, for women are not worthy of life.” Gospel of Thomas.
Peter ,who denied his “Lord” three times. Peter, who Yeshua told ,”Behind me Satan!”
This Askew tractate of six works was acquired from the family and heirs of a Dr Anthony Askew in 1785 by the British Museum in London.